Proxy Index
OverviewReportsRankings
MethodologyBlogAbout
LensProxy Index
Scoring lensApplied across rankings and provider pages
PresetOur standard score: workload success counts 3×; speed, pool quality, trust, and session count 1× each.For latency-sensitive jobs: speed counts 5×, workload success 3×, and every other dimension 1×.For reputation-sensitive traffic: trust counts 5×, workload success 3×, and every other dimension 1×.For sticky account sessions: session stability counts 5×, workload success and trust 3×, and speed and pool quality 1×.

A score appears only when every dimension with a positive weight has comparable evidence. Saved on this device.

Latest report
Home › ISP static proxy providers
Current class comparison · Last 30 days · 2 ranked provider lines

ISP static proxy providers.

Compare every published ISP static proxy line on the same buyer-facing dimensions. Sort the cohort, inspect honest not-graded gaps, then open a provider review for the evidence behind the numbers.

2Ranked lines
2Published reviews
Last 30 daysEvidence window
Canonical proxy scorecard v1Methodology
Cohort comparison

Compare the full class

Grades are comparable within each column. A dash means the required evidence was absent—not that the provider scored zero.

Provider comparison. Select a column heading to change the sort order.
#1NSTProxyCaveat: Low proxy sample →92.599.250.099.899.9100.0—8exit IPs
#2Bart ISPCaveat: Incomplete daily coverage →92.399.350.098.3100.0100.0—25exit IPs
Published analysis

Latest provider reviews

Reviews add editorial judgment and source context. Rankings remain visible even before a review is published.

Bart ISPJul 18, 2026

Bart ISP proxies review

Bart ISP proxies review based on the latest published benchmark report. Buyer-facing quality is reported through the measured dimensions.

Read the evidence →
NSTProxyJul 14, 2026

NSTProxy ISP proxies review

NSTProxy combines strong speed, pool quality, trust and sourcing, and session stability with weak workload success in the current eight-exit-IP ISP benchmark.

Read the evidence →
How to use this page

Start with workload fit, then inspect the tradeoffs.

Workload success summarizes real-target delivery. Speed, pool quality, trust and sourcing, session behavior, and value explain why providers with similar delivery can still suit different jobs.

Read the methodology →Open the latest class report →
Proxy Index

An independent benchmark of residential, ISP, mobile and datacenter proxy providers. Methodology, raw response logs and check timestamps are published with every issue.

One page per benchmark issue. No tracking pixels.

Reports

  • Latest issue
  • Residential
  • ISP
  • Mobile
  • Datacenter
  • Special reports
  • Archive

Methodology

  • Gate & dimensions
  • Measurement nodes
  • Caveat codes
  • Changelog
  • Raw datasets

About

  • How we're funded
  • Editorial independence
  • Submit a correction
  • Provider FAQ
  • Blog
  • Contact
© 2026 Proxy Index. Independent and self-funded. No provider money.